The result of 200 years of collectivism, or, if you prefer, statism. Which is an ideological excuse for the brutal proposition that one man’s life is another man’s property-all in the name of benevolence. This kind of power is disgusting to the elevated character but irresistible to the debased character. Should we be surprised at the results?
The result of 200 years of collectivism, or, if you prefer, statism. Which is an ideological excuse for the brutal proposition that one man’s life is another man’s property-all in the name of benevolence. This kind of power is disgusting to the elevated character but irresistible to the debased character. Should we be surprised at the results?
The result of 200 years of collectivism, or, if you prefer, statism. Which is an ideological excuse for the brutal proposition that one man’s life is another man’s property-all in the name of benevolence. This kind of power is disgusting to the elevated character but irresistible to the debased character. Should we be surprised at the results?